1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Summary and Conclusion

In the twenty-first century, society will be marked by change, complexity, creative innovation, and continental interdependence. Demographic shifts and the move from the Industrial Age to the Information Age have triggered trends and issues of places and people. The traditional physical settings of home, school, community, and workplace have become varied and are identified differently. Home, literally where "one hangs his or her hat," is characterized by more mobility and multiple locations, especially in the case of bicoastal marriages, and is a circumstance that is increasingly more prevalent. On the more adverse side are the "homeless" people, recognized by transience and rootlessness. Today there are public, private, home, charter, and magnet schools with the time of school varying according to the settings in which they occur. The workday has become a twenty-four-hour, seven-day-a-week situation aided by technological advances. Families and communities have also undergone changes and new definitions. Besides the traditional family structure, family units now consist of multiple adults, single parents (either gender), and extended families. In many ways, the traditional family is now the nontraditional family.

With all of these relationships at work in our society, a causal effect of interdependence is developing, and yet there is a great need for self-actualization and individualization—a desire for personal choices and space, learning styles, and preferences. More and more, institutional structures are embracing collaborations and partnerships. Business and industry, government, education, community organization and agencies, and professional service organizations (health and medical) are developing programs designed to benefit one another collectively and at the same time to have greater impact in the communities of which they are a part.

As a consequence of all of these changing environments and relationships, the music teaching profession must give a new meaning to a place called school and view it as a process called education. We need to expand the focus of music education to include all ages (from early childhood through adulthood) and all settings. At the same time, we need to increase access to quality music instruction for all members of society and celebrate cultural differences and similarities. How do we create programs that draw teachers from broader backgrounds, representing the students of diverse cultures—welcoming them into the profession? How do we maintain high standards and excellence in teaching? As the world community shrinks, music education will need to broaden its perspective and revitalize and restructure its teaching methods, curricula, and teacher-training procedures.

In view of demographic indicators discussed herein, which forecast a huge minority population explosion and its numerical dominance in the next millennium, the greatest challenge to America is not in the arts; the greatest challenge to America is to provide a superior education and equal access to it, as well as equal job opportunities with fair employment and housing practices, so that economic prosperity is also, on balance, spread among all of its hard-working and deserving citizens, regardless of race or ethnicity, age, or gender. If America were to live up to the principles written in the Constitution, that actualization would provide a society more complete and sophisticated than the world has ever seen. To do this our collective efforts must be directed: Will we learn from the lessons of the past (i.e., slavery and the civil rights movement, the Holocaust, ethnic uprisings in Bosnia and Kosovo, the apartheid in South Africa)? How will we use the wonderful advances in technology to achieve our goals? The basic question remains paramount: In the next millennium, what can music education do to enhance its place in our educational system and in the lives of America's vast and varied population? How can we make certain that our long-established goals to educate every person, regardless of age, gender, or race, will be realized?

It is becoming abundantly clear that the time is past for more pronouncements, speeches, and expository and exploratory scholarship centered on cultural diversity and multicultural issues as they have an impact upon the American people and the social institutions that influence our lives. Certainly there has been more than enough said and written about these issues in music education, in our accreditation agencies, in arts funding organizations, in our national associations, and in the confer ences and publications they provide.

The supporting businesses (the music industry) that supply materials and equipment that we use in our profession have made a wealth of related teaching tools available. As we learn more about world music, we discover a wide array of instruments to be used as tools for music making. We will need to include knowledge and experiences with these in our music classrooms. Technology is helping us redefine these tools, as well. Wind controllers, samplers, synthesizers, and sequencers are examples of how this is being done. Students who participate in computer based music instruction are making more choices about what they use to invent for musical examples. When they make those choices, there is ownership in the curriculum and they discover through experiences that there is more to learn and know about the subject in which they are already interested. Music educators will need to become more knowledgeable about what music students are choosing to listen to and use the information to make their teaching and curriculum more relevant. "Westernization" of the music of other cultures robs them of their true character. With this understanding, creative movement and improvisation therefore take on a new meaning and will be elevated in importance in the curriculum of the future. Now is the time to implement new strategies for restructuring our curricular designs (infusing the National Standards), to reform policies and practices, to improve and increase human resources, and redefine/reorganize schedules to allow for a more accommodating use of teaching time in the school day.

In order for the National Standards to enjoy widespread use in our nation's schools, not only will curricula require careful revision but music teaching schedules will need skillful redesigning with realistic time allotments to allow for the quality instruction required to aid the development of music skills and understandings specified in the Standards. Music literacy can never be achieved on a once-a-week (45-60 minutes) class schedule, which is so often the case in our schools. The school year and the school day will have to be redefined. Many districts are experimenting with varied instructional formats (i.e., "early bird" classes, evening sessions, summer opportunities, and year-round schools).

Today a "one size fits all" mentality does not work in designing school schedules. While a seven-or-eight-period schedule is ineffective for some subjects, a four-period-only schedule creates new problems for others. Flexibility in scheduling seems to be the key, for it may be in the best interest for the students and learning. We need to explore new forms of scheduling as an opportunity to improve the school music program. For example, without a common planning time, integrating music with other subjects or classroom activities will occur sporadically and in all likelihood be superfluous.

Early childhood and adult music education will factor into that schedule. A recent issue of the Music Educators Journal included a special focus titled Music and Early Childhood.45 That issue provides timely information regarding training to prepare music educators to use music with young children; offers a list of characteristics MENC recommends that early childhood music teachers have; and lists model programs established in university and community settings around the country. Emerging research suggesting that children's early years are a key time for musical growth, and considering that this population will constitute a large segment of our society in the next millennium, indicates a growing concern for how music teaching will be impacted in the future. Harriet Hair states that research procedures with young children will be greatly influenced by the rapidly changing computer technology.46 Therefore centers for research on the musical characteristics of children should be established to provide electronic databases that would be available to educators and researchers.

Community partnerships with music education to provide for people of all ages may cause a relocation of "where music teaching happens" and the forms it will take. Venues may include churches, community music schools, after-school programs in child- or day-care centers, and other social agencies such as Boys and Girls Clubs and retirement centers.

In the United States, current and ongoing demographics that affect the nation's cultural, social, religious and political conditions mandate that curricular revisions across disciplines in education are necessary in our nation's public and private schools, colleges and universities. At the same time, sophisticated telecommunications technology (including expanded global use of cyberspace), rapid aerospace travel, geopolitical dynamics, increasing transcontinental corporate presence, and universal changes in ethical and moral values are all forms drawing the cultures of the world together.47

The next millennium will be an exciting opportunity for innovations and creative adaptation of teaching methodologies and materials in music education. Indeed, the traditional cycle by which music education achieves its leadership must be redefined. It must begin with the training of teachers representative of diverse cultures who will instruct our youth (also of diverse cultures) and extend into music major programs in colleges and universities. In this manner we will be presented with increased opportunities to learn about music of the world's cultures even as we teach the people of those cultures. Crosscultural fertilization of musical ideas and traditions will surely take place in the academy. Music education has the opportunity, indeed the responsibility, to lead our nation in becoming a true democracy, where every person learns to sing and play in harmony, dance with rhythmic grace, and truly become an instrument of peace for the world's people. Music really is a universal language . . . of, for, and by the people.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Ho
Home |  Housewright Declaration |  Tanglewood Declaration | MENC History
 |  Links | Search Site | Feedback

© MENC 2000. All rights reserved.